Skip to content

The Regulatory Revolving Door

October 17, 2013

The revolving door between government and the agribusiness giant Monsanto has spun again. Former Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Arkansas) has been hired to lobby on behalf of Monsanto. Lincoln had served as the chair of the Senate’s Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry (becoming the first woman to hold that post) until she lost re-election in 2010.

Since leaving the Senate, Lincoln has been active as a policy advisor for a DC-based law firm. In 2011 she announced she was leaving the firm to establish her own lobbying group, the Lincoln Policy Group, which earned about $13.7 million in revenue in its first year. Its clients include Wal-Mart, the credit bureau Experian, the Natural Gas Association of America, and more recently, Comcast, the oil company Valero, and Monsanto.

The revolving door between Monsanto and the government has long been a point of concern for food policy activists.  Numerous examples exist.


The argument in favor of such cross-pollination between industry and regulators it that there is a limited pool of expertise; that those inside the industry best understand the questions raised by the new technologies. Indeed, Monsanto has a webpage dedicated to defending the practice and accusing those who raise questions about the revolving door of trying to muddy the waters around the safety of the technology and food itself.

But this is a great example of how the perception is as important as whatever reality might underlie it. If the public perceives the regulatory system to be compromised by the revolving door between industry and government, then the public is more likely to mistrust regulatory decisions, whatever they might be.


From → Uncategorized

  1. Reblogged this on Food (Policy) For Thought and commented:
    When the line between business and policy-makers blurs so much, can we still trust politicians to make decisions purely motivated by the public good?

  2. Savannagh Ryane permalink

    It’s a shame it is a completely unlevel playing field. Lobbyists are only interested in the money they can make and by and large will support anything for $$$. Big Multinational companies such as Monsanto have deep coffers and are willing to spend it, while the consumer is usually unaware as to decisions made far away in Washington, D.C. that will affect their food ingredients. As consumers we must try to ferret out truth and vote with our pocket books. The story of “David vs Goliath” is apt. Chemical companies have no interest in our in our well being. Monsanto must be stopped.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: